The measure of restraint ex-Director of the airport complex of Domodedovo Vyacheslav Nekrasov and managing Director of “Domodedovo airport Aviation Security” Andrey Danilov asked to change the detention to house arrest. This was reported by press Secretary of the Basmanny court Juno Tsarev, reports the Agency “Moscow”
“The court received the petition of the investigating authorities to change the measure of restraint from detention to house arrest in relation to Nekrasov and Daniel,” said she. He also said that the investigation will be asked to extend them a measure of suppression.
Earlier the Moscow city court refused to release from-under house arrest co-owner of Domodedovo airport, businessman Dmitry Mason. On April 14, the Basmanny court extended the Mason a term of house arrest until July, the judge refused to release the businessman on bail in 50 million rbl.
The defendants in the case about the terrorist attack in Domodedovo airport in January 2011 are Mason and three ex-managers of the airport. In addition to Nekrasov and Danilova they include Svetlana Trishina. She is under house arrest until 28 April, Danilov and Nekrasov is under arrest.
Criminal case under article 238 of the Russian criminal code was initiated in April of 2015. The investigation considers, in 2010, managers of Domodedovo without reason has simplified the procedure for examination of citizens at the airport. This, I believe in law enforcement, has allowed to carry out a terrorist attack on 24 January 2011, which killed 37 people.
Mason maintains his innocence and the innocence of former employees of Domodedovo. The employees of the RCDS were arrested in mid-February. The Prosecutor General’s office filed a protest against the decision of the Basmanny court, which issued the restraint the co-owner of the airport.
On 24 March the General Prosecutor’s office threatened to contact the court, if the TFR does not stop criminal prosecution of the businessman. On the same day in the Domodedovo city court, the defense tried to challenge the initiation of proceedings, but the court decided that this issue should be considered by the Basmanny court.