The court rejected the petition of the brother of Navalny of parole

Monday, June 27, Uritsky district court of Orel region has considered the issue of conditional early release (PAROLE) Oleg Navalny, brother of opposition leader and Director of the Fund of struggle against corruption (FBK) Alexei Navalny. In UDO Navalny, the court refused, the correspondent of “RIA Novosti” from the courtroom. Judge Vladimir Logas reminded of the penalties that got in the colony of Oleg Navalny. “Not changed their attitude to the regime of detention”, — explained his decision by the judge, quoted by “the Media”.

At the end of December 2014 Oleg Navalny was sentenced by the Zamoskvoretsky district court of Moscow by three and a half years in a penal colony in the so-called “Yves Rocher”. Together with his brother term and Alexei Navalny — the same three and a half years, but conditionally.

Oleg Navalny is serving a sentence in penal colony №5, which is located in the village of Naryshkino, Oryol region. There he left to serve another two years. Ahead of the meeting Oleg Navalny in his account in Facebook reported that in the week before hearings on his PAROLE, the prison administration issued three new penalties. One report ended educational conversation to be entered in a personal matter, two resulted in penalties in the form of a written reprimand.” Hearings on PAROLE Navalny came up with 12 outstanding penalties that may hinder him to go ahead, suggested the convicted person; during the detention he got 21 penalty.

Initially the meeting was planned behind closed doors directly into the colony in connection with the repair at the courthouse, but later it became known that the process will still be open.

The petition of Oleg Navalny PAROLE was read out by his lawyer Kirill Polozov, as the convicted person participated in the meeting via video link from prison, writes “the Media”. Bulk referred to the normal Criminal procedure code (CPC), according to which PAROLE can you ask, after serving more than 2/3 of the sentence based on felony counts). The lawyer presented the positive characteristics of the defendant: it is published in the media, and his employer — the editors of magazine The New Times — ensures the employment of Oleg after release.

Foreclosure that failed to repay the Bulk before the meeting on PAROLE, the prison administration imposed specifically to prevent the release, said the lawyer, stressing that it was done illegally. The Bulk of the penalties mentioned in its final report, and former Commissioner for human rights Ella Pamfilova. Penalty had to be supported by video recordings of violations on the Registrar’s staff, but was not stated in the report of the Ombudsman.

The Prosecutor opposed the parole, citing the numerous punishments of the convicted. Representative colonies also opposed PAROLE Bulk.

Alexey Navalny, speaking in the court, suggested that the only fault of the convicted person that he’s the brother of a prominent politician is about the same, the defense repeatedly said during the trial on the “case “Yves Rocher” Navalny recalled. According to him, the collection of Oleg Navalny is revenge for investigations and political activities.

According to investigators, Navalny brothers founded the company “Glavpodpiska” and using his official position Oleg in the “Mail of Russia”, was awarded a contract for delivery of goods of the company “Yves Rocher Vostok”. In fact, the services provided by the transport company, which hired Oleg at prices lower than paid by the company “Yves Rocher Vostok”. A similar situation, according to the prosecution, exists with the delivery of goods for the firm of the IPC.

Prosecutors during the debate of the parties requested the sentence Alexei Navalny to ten years of imprisonment, and Oleg to eight years, and to pay them 4.5 million rubles. in favor of the IPC. The verdict of the Zamoskvoretsky district court of Moscow Prosecutor’s office considered too mild and appealed against it, but the Moscow city court left the decision of a lower court stands.

Navalny, however, insisted in court that he had not committed any crime. According to the brothers, “Glavpodpiska” was created for organization of subscription to periodicals via the Internet. But the service was not in demand, and Alexei Navalny gave the company to his brother, who began to organize the movement of goods. The company was engaged in usual economic activity, emphasized Bulk.