Central Bank has revoked the licenses of three banks

In the official report of the Bank of Russia indicated that on April 28 was revoked the license for banking operations from the credit organisation of KB “the international Bank of construction”, which occupied the 423-th place in the Russian banking system.

In the case of International construction Bank to be the cause of the problems, the Central Bank called the use of extremely risky business models and poor quality of a significant part of the assets associated with lending to companies with signs of a lack of viable economic activities. While in the Bank’s activity was traced to unfair actions of its management and owners, expressed in the withdrawal of assets to the detriment of the interests of creditors and holding the “scheme” operations aimed at hiding the real level of credit risk.

The second Bank lost their licenses, became Vladimir Vladprombank, occupies a 287-e a place in the banking system. According to the Central Bank, the organization for a long period was in the field of view of the Bank of Russia due to the implementation by the Bank of various schemes of doubtful operations of clients, including those undertaken for the accounts of companies whose business is associated with transactions with precious metals.

High involvement, LLC “Vladprombank” in carrying out certain questionable transactions in terms of repeated application of oversight measures aimed at excluding the participation of the Bank in servicing certain segments of the black market, testified to the absence of intentions of management and the owners of the Bank to take measures on normalization of its activity, is spoken in the message of the regulator.

In both the Bank appointed a temporary administration.

International construction Bank and Vladprombank are participants of system of insurance of contributions.

Last night it became known that the Bank of Russia revoked a license from Omsk credit institutions “SIBES”, which occupied the 352-nd place by assets. The reason was the presence of critically elevated risks associated with refinancing the debt of individuals and the implementation of the “scheme” of transactions acquired from microfinance institutions rights requirements on consumer loans.